Energy Secretary Chris Wright announced the cancellation of nearly $4 billion in clean energy project grants, mostly awarded during the final months of President Joe Biden’s term. These grants primarily supported carbon capture and storage technologies, along with cleaner industrial processes involving cement and natural gas. Key recipients affected include Heidelberg Materials, Eastman Chemical, and Nevada Gold Mines.
Critics Condemn Cancellations as Administration Cites Fiscal Responsibility and National Security Priorities
The cancellations have drawn sharp criticism from clean energy advocates, who argue the move undermines U.S. competitiveness in the growing global market for clean industrial technologies. Experts say the decision contradicts the administration’s stated goals of supporting energy innovation and environmental progress, risking the country’s leadership in emerging energy solutions.
Trump Administration Scraps $4 Billion in Clean Energy Grants, Citing Fiscal and Security ConcernsThe Trump administration justifies the cancellations as part of a broader effort to ensure “responsible” use of taxpayer dollars and align with government-wide efficiency initiatives. Wright emphasized that the previous administration did not conduct thorough financial reviews before awarding billions, and that this step is meant to protect national security and focus on projects with the highest returns.
Widespread Environmental Rollbacks Prioritize Fossil Fuels, Sparking Industry and Advocacy Backlash
This decision fits into a wider rollback of Biden-era environmental policies under the current administration, which has cut climate project funding and weakened regulations. The focus has shifted towards promoting oil and gas production under the banner of “American energy dominance,” sparking concerns among environmental and clean energy groups.
The cancellations have been widely condemned by industry leaders and climate advocates. They warn that cutting support for carbon capture and other clean energy projects will raise energy costs, cost jobs, increase pollution, and harm public health. Many view the move as shortsighted and harmful to America’s manufacturing future and environmental commitments.
